OMEGA · example record
Example governed decision record, AI oversight
Companion artefact, EU AI Act Article 14. Warren Smith, May 2026.
In plain English
On the morning of 14 May, a customer asked an automated system for a £4,820 refund on faulty equipment. The amount was high enough that the system was not allowed to approve it alone, so it called in a human supervisor named Sarah. This is the record of what they decided and why. It lets a reviewer verify that the stored record still matches what was committed.
Article 14 of the EU AI Act requires that natural persons can effectively oversee high-risk AI. A record of the oversight event, not just a log line, is what shows the obligation was met.
This is a stylised example. It is structurally accurate but not authoritative legal or regulatory guidance, and does not represent any specific firm, customer, or transaction. Hashes are not computed for this illustrative record.
The record
CONTEXT
customer #C-884213
order #O-2026-04471, bespoke audio, value £4,820
window 30-day quality-assurance window applies
authority Tier A/B/C escalation schedule (v2026-02-17)
DECISION
approve full £4,820 refund + return collection + £120 goodwill credit
by Sarah Okafor, Senior Customer Operations Manager (#ops-2218)
agent prepared the case; did not commit
EVIDENCE AND ASSUMPTIONS
evidence order value, three photographs, spec mismatch on channel count/gain
assumed identity via login + 2FA; photographs authentic; moderate vision
confidence; no fraud signal
AUTHORITY
schedule Tier C; agent system CS-Agent v3.4.1; hard stop above limit;
signed approval token required
CONSTRAINTS CHECKED
ok supervisor delegated limit £15,000/case; token single-use
flags moderate vision confidence; £120 goodwill credit
OUTCOME
status COMMITTED; refund initiated; return booked; token consumed once
PROVENANCE
note Illustrative record. Hashes not computed.
schema validated against omega-contracts v0.2.2
seal illustrative (not a computed seal) Companion artefact CC BY 4.0; the protocols are MIT. Back to OMEGA