Ω Omega Protocol Bring us a question
PROVEN

Finding · authorise

A limit on what an agent may do was proved to hold no matter how concurrent operations interleave.

§ 1

The record

FINDING · concurrent-capability-bound-over-interleavingsauthorise
A limit on what an agent may do was proved to hold no matter how concurrent operations interleave.
Claim
A capability meter never exceeds its cap over every concurrent interleaving of charge operations, proved in Iris concurrent separation logic for any cap and any finite list of operations.
Status
PROVEN Follows from stated premises inside a named frame.
Question
Individually compliant is not collectively safe
Subject
A Rocq/Iris model of a concurrent capability meter (model). built for the study
Frame
Any cap, any finite list of charge operations, every interleaving; terminal-observation safety only.
Method
Adequacy over every reachable configuration in Iris concurrent separation logic.
Oracle
The Rocq kernel; Print Assumptions committed and diffed in CI.
Negative control
Present Floor E: an explicit counterexample showing per-key safety does not certify a tighter cross-key aggregate bound.
Limitation
It is terminal-observation safety, the value the driver reads is within the cap, not an all-intermediate-state invariant, and it carries no liveness or wait-freedom. The kernel check was not re-run in this pass; axiom-freedom rests on the committed assumptions audit plus a live search finding no admitted goals.
Source
repowazdogz-droid/capctl-iris @ 5e9284a0
Reproduce
eval $(opam env --switch=capctl-iris) && make verify
Independent reproduction
None known.
§ 2

Where this sits

This finding answers Individually compliant is not collectively safe and supports the AUTHORISE stage of the operating method.

Evidence ledgerBring us a problem