Ω Omega Protocol Bring us a question
PROVEN

Finding · authorise

A spending cap was proved to hold in every state the system can reach, not just the ones anyone tested.

§ 1

The record

FINDING · budget-bound-for-all-reachable-statesauthorise
A spending cap was proved to hold in every state the system can reach, not just the ones anyone tested.
Claim
Total spend never exceeds the cap in any reachable state of the escrow protocol, proved in Lean for any finite set of replicas and any non-negative amounts.
Status
PROVEN Follows from stated premises inside a named frame.
Question
Individually compliant is not collectively safe
Subject
A Lean 4 model of the escrow protocol (model). built for the study
Frame
Any finite set of replicas, any non-negative amounts; crash is global in the Lean model.
Method
Induction over reachable states with the budget bound as the invariant; a TLA+ model and a Python fault harness exercise what the proof does not.
Oracle
The Lean 4 kernel (v4.32.0), axioms propext and Quot.sound only.
Negative control
Present Four proved negative controls: remove a guard and the theorem must fail.
Limitation
The bound, not conservation. No liveness, availability, or Byzantine model; crash is global in the Lean model, and per-replica crash is only exercised in the bounded checks. The proof holds relative to the transition system being a faithful abstraction of the protocol, which is argued, not machine-checked.
Source
repowazdogz-droid/escrow-budget @ 9c199db4
Reproduce
make clean && make check
Independent reproduction
None known.
§ 2

Where this sits

This finding answers Individually compliant is not collectively safe and supports the AUTHORISE stage of the operating method.

Evidence ledgerBring us a problem